Simulation-based Medical Education Research Articles

High-Fidelity, Indigenously Prepared, Low-Cost Moulage as a Valid Simulation Tool to Improve Trauma Education.

Background Simulation-based trauma education facilitates repeated practice in a controlled and safer environment for the learner without any risk to the patient's well-being. Moulage contributes to the perception of reality during training using standardized patients. However, the high cost of commercial moulage items is often prohibitive for regular use. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of indigenously prepared, low-cost moulage as a valid simulation tool to improve trauma education, explore possible replacements of commercial moulage products, and determine their merits and demerits. Methodology Readily available economic items were used to make low-cost moulage on the simulated patients to replicate trauma victims. A cross-sectional design used a pre-validated Modified Moulage Authenticity Rating Scale to collect data from 61 participants of Advanced Trauma Life Support and Advanced Trauma Care for Nurses courses to analyze the effectiveness and fidelity of moulage. Results In total, 54 (89%) participants scored the low-cost moulage to provide high fidelity effectively. The majority of respondents graded the authenticity of moulage as good. Overall, 46 (75%) participants felt moulage injuries were quite realistic. All agreed that the moulage-based simulation offered a good teaching-learning alternative to assess and manage trauma victims. Further, 45 (73%) participants felt they were in an actual clinical situation, and 58 (95%) stated it could help them in their clinical practice. Conclusions Indigenously prepared, low-cost moulage is a feasible and cost-effective means to enhance fidelity in simulation-based trauma education. It can also be a possible replacement for commercial moulage. Further research is needed to rigorously evaluate the effectiveness of indigenously prepared, cost-effective moulage in trauma education to enhance patient care outcomes. This technique can also be easily translated into other simulation-based medical education domains.

Using Mixed Reality Simulation to Improve Junior Medical Trainees’ Preparedness to Manage High-Acuity Trauma

High-acuity trauma necessitates experienced and rapid intervention to prevent patient harm. However, upskilling junior trainees through hands-on management of real trauma cases is rarely feasible without compromising patient safety. This...

Simulation-based medical education in Canadian anesthesiology academic institutions: a national survey.

Simulation-based medical education (SBME) is provided by all anesthesiology residency programs in Canada. The purpose of this study was to characterize SBME in Canadian anesthesiology residency training programs. We administered a 21-question survey to the simulation director/coordinator for all 17 Canadian academic departments of anesthesiology from October 2019 to January 2020. The survey consisted of questions pertaining to the characteristics of the simulation centres, their faculty, learners, curriculum, and assessment processes. All 17 residency training programs participated in the survey and reported large variability in the number and formal training of simulation faculty and in content delivery. Five programs (29%) did not provide faculty recognition for curriculum design and running simulation sessions. Most programs offered one to four simulation sessions per academic year for each year of residency. All programs offered mannequin-based and part-task trainers for teaching technical and nontechnical skills. Fourteen programs (82%) offered interprofessional and interdisciplinary simulation sessions, and ten programs (59%) did not include in situ simulation training. Commonly reported barriers to faculty involvement were lack of protected time (12 programs, 71%), lack of financial compensation (ten programs, 59%), and lack of appreciation for SBME (seven programs, 41%). Large variability exists in the delivery of SBME in Canadian anesthesiology residency simulation programs, in part because of differences in financial/human resources and educational content. Future studies should explore whether training and patient outcomes differ between SBME programs and, if so, whether additional standardization is warranted.

Feasibility and evaluation of high-fidelity simulation education for acute clinical toxicology.

To prepare medical students appropriately for the management of toxicological emergencies, we have developed a simulation-based medical education (SBME) training in acute clinical toxicology. Our aim is to report on the feasibility, evaluation and lessons learned of this training. Since 2019, each year approximately 180 fifth-year medical students are invited to participate in the SBME training. The training consists of an interactive lecture and two SBME stations. For each station, a team of students had to perform the primary assessment and management of an intoxicated patient. After the training, the students completed a questionnaire about their experiences and confidence in clinical toxicology. Overall, the vast majority of students agreed that the training provided a fun, interactive and stimulating way to teach about clinical toxicology. Additionally, they felt more confident regarding their skills in this area. Our pilot study shows that SBME training was well-evaluated and feasible over a longer period.

Current Use of Simulation in Canadian Cardiology Residency Programs: Painting the Landscape to Better Visualize the Future

Simulation-based medical education (SBME) has been proposed as a method to expose cardiology residents to common and uncommon clinical scenarios. This approach aims to develop the core clinical competencies required for practice amidst many constraints, such as reduced training hours, limited patient encounters, and increased healthcare complexity. SBME fits particularly well in the Canadian Competency-by-Design framework, where the emphasis is on measurable competencies and achievement of milestones. This survey-based study aims to outline the current uses of SBME in Canadian cardiology residency programs, explore opportunities for SBME to enhance current approaches and identify barriers to its integration into the curriculum.

Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Training for Simulated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Resident Education.

Simulation-based medical education has been used in medical training for decades. Rapid cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) is a novel simulation strategy that uses iterative practice and feedback to achieve skill mastery. To date, there has been minimal evaluation of RCDP vs standard immersive simulation (IS) for the teaching of cardiopulmonary resuscitation to graduate medical education (GME) learners. Our primary objective was to compare the time to performance of Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) actions between trainees who completed RCDP vs IS. This study was a prospective, randomized, controlled curriculum evaluation. A total of 55 postgraduate year-1 internal medicine and emergency medicine residents participated in the study. Residents were randomized to instruction by RCDP (28) or IS (27). Stress and ability were self-assessed before and after training using an anonymous survey that incorporated five-point Likert-type questions. We measured and compared times to initiate critical ACLS actions between the two groups during a subsequent IS. Prior learner experience between RCDP and IS groups was similar. Times to completion of the first pulse check, chest compression initiation, backboard placement, pad placement, initial rhythm analysis, first defibrillation, epinephrine administration, and antiarrhythmic administration were similar between RCDP and IS groups. However, RCDP groups took less time to complete the pulse check between compression cycles (6.2 vs 14.2 seconds, P = 0.01). Following training, learners in the RCDP and IS groups scored their ability to lead and their levels of anticipated stress similarly (3.43 vs 3.30, (P = 0.77), 2.43 vs. 2.41, P = 0.98, respectively). However, RCDP groups rated their ability to participate in resuscitation more highly (4.50 vs 3.96, P = 0.01). The RCDP groups also reported their realized stress of participating in the event as lower than that of the IS groups (2.36 vs 2.85, P = 0.01). Rapid cycle deliberate practice learners demonstrated a shorter pulse check duration, reported lower stress levels associated with their experience, and rated their ability to participate in ACLS care more highly than their IS-trained peers. Our results support further investigation of RCDP in other simulation settings.

Efficacy of an Antimicrobial Reality Simulator (AMRSim) as an Educational Tool for Teaching Antimicrobial Stewardship to Veterinary Medicine Undergraduates

Purpose: Simulation-based medical education has changed the teaching of clinical practice skills, with scenario-based simulations being particularly effective in supporting learning in veterinary medicine. In this study, we explore the efficacy of simulation education to teach infection prevention and control (IPC) as part of Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) teaching for early years clinical veterinary medicine undergraduates. Methods: The intervention was designed as a 30-minute workshop with a simulation and script delivered online for 130 students as a part of hybrid teaching within the undergraduate curriculum. Learning outcome measures were compared between an intervention group and waitlist-control group using one-way between-groups analysis of covariance tests. Results: Significant differences between groups were found for outcomes measures related to short-term knowledge gain and confidence in IPC and AMS in small animal clinical practice. However, lateral knowledge transfer to large animal species clinical practice showed no significant differences. Student feedback indicated that the intervention was an enjoyable and engaging way to learn AMS. Conclusions: The intervention provided short-term knowledge gain in IPC protocols and enhanced procedural skills via active learning and motivation to learn in large groups of students. Future improvements would be to include large animal clinical scenario discussions and evaluate longer-term knowledge gain.

Mastering Sedation and Associated Respiratory Events through Simulation-Based Training: A Randomised Controlled Trial Involving Non-Anaesthesiology Residents.

Non-anaesthetists commonly administer procedural sedation worldwide, posing the risk of respiratory events that can lead to severe complications. This study aimed to evaluate whether simulation-based learning could lead to enhancements in the clinical proficiency of non-anaesthesiology residents in managing sedation and related respiratory complications. Following the evaluation of baseline clinical performance through a pre-test simulation, 34 residents were randomly allocated to either participate in an innovative simulation-based learning module (intervention group) or view a brief self-learning video (control group). After a one-month period, their clinical performance was assessed again in a post-test simulation involving respiratory arrest during procedural sedation. Two independent assessors rated each resident's performance using video recordings and a scoring tool with scores ranging from 0 to 19/19. The two assessments were averaged for each performance, and the pre- to post-test change was calculated for each resident. While baseline clinical performance was similar, mean (SD) increase in clinical performance was significantly greater in the intervention group than in the control group (+2.4 (1.6) points versus +0.8 (1.3) points, respectively; p = 0.002). Our simulation-based learning sedation module resulted in the enhanced management of sedation-related complications compared to baseline and minimal self-learning. Simulation-based medical education may offer an effective approach for equipping non-anaesthesiology residents with essential skills to mitigate risks associated with sedation. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02722226).

Assessment of performance and confidence level of simulation based clinical examination of respiratory system in undergraduate medical students of a medical college: a comparative cross-sectional study

Introduction: Students in the preclinical phase have adequate clinical exposure to normal physiological findings of clinical examinations performed in healthy peers but do not have exposure to pathological findings other than theoretical knowledge, which is challenging for students during the clinical phase of curricula in examining actual patients. Simulation based medical education (SBME) has recently emerged to address this gap. This study aimed to assess performance and confidence level of simulation based clinical examination of respiratory system in preclinical undergraduate medical students of a medical college. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Human Physiology of Medical College. All second year medical students using purposive sampling were taken. Students were divided into three groups and subdivided into six subgroups and each subgroup carried out examination in either healthy subjects or both healthy subjects and manikin. Predesigned proforma was used for assessment of students and the clinical examination process was invigilated by certified physiologists. Results: Students who received both simulation and conventional tutoring methods were able to accurately identify all lung sounds better as compared to those with conventional tutoring with the percentage difference being maximum in identifying vesicular (29 vs 6), stridor (28 vs 6), and bronchial (25 vs 6) breath sounds and least in identifying coarse crackles (3 vs 2). Majority (39 out of 41) of the students receiving SBME of respiratory system were satisfied with the simulation based practice and 34 of those students were even confident on clinical examination. Conclusion: SBME increases performance status and confidence level in medical students. A practical curriculum can be planned to incorporate simulation based clinical examination in preclinical medical students in practical sessions.

Efficiency of Simulation-Based Learning Using an ABC POCUS Protocol on a High-Fidelity Simulator.

Critically ill patients with rapidly deteriorating clinical status secondary to respiratory and cardio-vascular compromise are at risk for immediate collapse if the underlying pathology is not recognized and treated. Rapid diagnosis is of utmost importance regardless of the setting. Although there are data to support the use of point-of-care ultrasound in critical patients, there is no consensus about the best educational strategy to implement. We designed a curriculum based on the ABC (Airway, Breathing, Circulation) protocol that covers essential airway, lung, and cardiac ultrasound skills needed for fast diagnosis in critical patients and applied it in high-fidelity simulation-based medical education sessions for anesthesia and intensive care residents year one and two. After theoretical and practical assessments, our results show statistical differences in the theoretical knowledge and above-average results in practical assessment. Our proposed curriculum based on a simple ABC POCUS protocol, with an Airway, Breathing, and Circulation approach, is useful in teaching ultrasound basics regarding airway, lung, and cardiac examination using high-fidelity simulation training to anesthesia and intensive care residents, but further research is needed to establish the utility of Simulation-Based Medical Education in Point of Care Ultrasound in the critical patient.

Simulation-based Training for Anaesthesiology Residents: A Boon

Training in anaesthesiology necessitates exposure to diverse clinical situations, demanding quick thinking, decision-making, and intervention. Achieving expertise in this field traditionally requires years of clinical practice and exposure to various scenarios. Simulation-Based Medical Education (SBME) revolutionises anaesthesiology training by providing a controlled environment where trainees can acquire knowledge, refine clinical skills, and develop clinical and non clinical competencies. This approach includes training in soft skills, critical analysis of clinical scenarios, and receiving constructive feedback from qualified instructors. In alignment with industries like aviation and the military, various countries have incorporated SBME into medical curricula. The present scoping review explores the benefits, limitations, and diverse applications of SBME for anaesthesiology trainees. The historical progression of SBME, from basic procedural models to advanced simulations and virtual reality, underscores its transformative impact on medical education. Standards and accreditation for simulation laboratories ensure quality maintenance in training programs. SBME in anaesthesiology focuses on technical skill development and cultivating crucial non technical skills essential for patient safety. The review emphasises the need for a comprehensive curriculum, qualified instructors, reliable equipment, and ethical considerations to establish standards for simulation in anaesthesia. The versatility of simulation types, including low-fidelity task trainers, high-fidelity mannequins, and virtual simulations, enhances training opportunities. Anaesthesia simulation encompasses a spectrum of scenarios, from cardiothoracic anaesthesia to airway management, addressing technical and soft skills. While SBME offers advantages such as enhanced teamwork, regulated skill development, and exposure to rare situations, drawbacks include costs, ethical concerns, and replicating real-world complexity. Ongoing research is crucial to assess the effectiveness of SBME and its impact on patient outcomes. The evolving significance of SBME in anaesthesiology suggests its continued promise for breakthroughs in medical education.

Leveraging Historical Medical Records as a Proxy via Multimodal Modeling and Visualization to Enrich Medical Diagnostic Learning.

Simulation-based Medical Education (SBME) has been developed as a cost-effective means of enhancing the diagnostic skills of novice physicians and interns, thereby mitigating the need for resource-intensive mentor-apprentice training. However, feedback provided in most SBME is often directed towards improving the operational proficiency of learners, rather than providing summative medical diagnoses that result from experience and time. Additionally, the multimodal nature of medical data during diagnosis poses significant challenges for interns and novice physicians, including the tendency to overlook or over-rely on data from certain modalities, and difficulties in comprehending potential associations between modalities. To address these challenges, we present DiagnosisAssistant, a visual analytics system that leverages historical medical records as a proxy for multimodal modeling and visualization to enhance the learning experience of interns and novice physicians. The system employs elaborately designed visualizations to explore different modality data, offer diagnostic interpretive hints based on the constructed model, and enable comparative analyses of specific patients. Our approach is validated through two case studies and expert interviews, demonstrating its effectiveness in enhancing medical training.

Simulation in contemporary medical education: Current practices and the way forward.

Integration of theoretical knowledge and practical skills is critical for effective medical education. Simulation is crucial in bridging the gap to prepare medical professionals for high-quality patient care in a safe environment. Simulation-based teaching has become the standard practice in medical education, especially in postgraduate courses like Anaesthesia. However, undergraduate medical education and other doctoral courses are still nascent. In line with the current National Medical Commission guidelines, it is imperative to complement the existing curriculum with a simulation-based approach as early as the first year of medical school. This review focuses on the current practices related to simulation-based medical education during undergraduate and postgraduate courses, particularly on anaesthesiology. We aim to discuss different types of simulation, the advantages of integration, students' perspectives, and the role of simulation in assessment and feedback. Finally, recommendations for future advancements of simulation in medical education and the way forward will be laid.

Simulation-Based Medical Education: A Boon for Medical Students? - An Integrative Review

Simulation is a synthetic representation of a real-world process with sufficient reliability to facilitate learning through contemplation and practice without the hazard, innate in a real-life experience. Nowadays, simulation is a useful accompaniment to medical education as pre-exposure to necessary clinical skills as exposure in the real clinical setting may be insufficient. Clinical skills and performance are considered core proficiency and are crucial to the professionals. This can enable the students to familiarize themselves with patient examination and hands-on- training by using models before coming across patients directly. Simulators are broadly classified into two broad categories: 1. High-fidelity Simulators and 2. Low-fidelity simulators. The fidelity of a simulator is decided by the extent to which it provides realism through characteristics. Simulation Based Medical Education (SBME) provides a safe environment for the students to acquire their psychomotor skill but is not necessarily better than other types of instruction as there is a high degree of variability between studies. SBME has been introduced in the health care field and now it is becoming one of the most popular teaching techniques for improving patient safety and care. It would be advantageous if it is included in medical curricula as it may proof boon for the young medicos. Keywords: Medical simulation; SBME; Simulators

Barriers and enablers to achieving clinical procedure competency-based outcomes in a national paediatric training/residency program—a multi-centered qualitative study

BackgroundIn 2018, the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland revised its paediatric training program to a competency-based medical education (CBME) training/residency curriculum. This included a requirement to achieve competence in a number of core procedural skills to progress within the program. Internationally, simulation-based medical education (SBME) is gaining interest as an effective teaching pedagogy for training procedural skill competency. The objectives of this study were to (1) identify enablers and barriers for paediatric trainees to achieve their required procedural competencies, (2) gain insight on the feasibility of achieving the required procedural skills, and (3) explore what simulation-based resources are used as well as their role in achieving the required procedural skill competencies.MethodsA multi-centered qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was performed. Twenty-four paediatric consultants and trainees were recruited from two academic tertiary hospitals using purposive and snowball sampling. Interviews were conducted between March and September 2021, audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis.ResultsThree main themes regarding enablers for achieving procedural competencies were reported and include having protected training time, routine assessments, and a standardized curriculum. Barriers to achieving procedural competencies focused mainly on limited clinical exposure. The use of SBME was recommended by all participants (n = 24, 100%) to assist in achieving procedural competencies and most (n = 15, 62.5%) reported it is feasible to attain the required procedural skills in the paediatric CBME program.ConclusionIt is feasible to achieve the required procedural competencies for most paediatric trainees, but this can be improved with protected training time, routine assessments, and a standardized curriculum. Barriers to achieving these skills mainly center on limited clinical exposure, which can be remedied by SBME. Further research is warranted to determine the costs and types of SBME tools available as well as teaching pedagogies to support paediatric trainees achieve their required procedural competencies.

SİMÜLASYON TEMELLİ TIP EĞİTİMİN BÜTÇEYE SAĞLADIĞI KLİNİK VE EKONOMİK FAYDALAR

Especially in the last two decades, there has been an increase in simulation-based training applications to increase the technical and non-technical skills of health care providers. In many scientific studies, thereare many studies on the effect of simulation education and research applications on theincrease of cost and clinical skills. In this study, we conducted a literature study on the clinical and economic benefits of simulation-based medical education on the budget. In this context, in order to determine the clinical and economic benefits of simulation-based medical education to the budget, a search was carried out on Google Schoolar, Pupmed and Science directs earch engines between 2010-2020 by entering the words "Simulation-basedmedical education, cost-effectiveness, budget effect". By using the word groups specified at theend of all these operations; Pubmed 75 Google Schoolar 162 and ScienceDirect 37 reached 274 results in total. All there sults obtained were reviewed and studies not directly related to the subject and the same articles that are duplicate of each other were excluded; A total of 21 results in the form of reviews, research articles, papers and reports were evaluated. The scientific studies evaluated within thescope of this study support the fact that simulation-based training practices provide clinical and economic benefits to the budget and that there is a positive relation ship between them.

A15Video review after simulation-based education – perception of participants

Simulation debriefing plays an important role in knowledge synthesis [1]. Although there is evidence to suggest that video-assisted debriefing improves outcomes, at least in nursing simulations, there is a wide variability in the practice and perceived effectiveness of video-assisted debriefing [2,3]. There is a paucity of literature about participants’ perspectives on the use of video review for simulation debriefing. The aim of this study is to explore participants’ perceptions and experience of the use of video review post-simulation. The study received ethical approval from the ethics committee at Anglia Ruskin University. We used qualitative research methodology to answer our research question. Foundation year trainees attending simulation as part of the curriculum were included in the study. This study involved focus group interviews with simulation participants prior to their simulation-based education. Post-simulation training, participants reviewed their simulation video clip in their own time and filled in a structured qualitative questionnaire about their video review experience. This is an ongoing research and initial results are presented here. Data were collected from 13 participants over a period of 3 months from February 2023 to April 2023 in the simulation centre of a tertiary teaching hospital in the UK. The audio recording and the questionnaire were pseudonymized and analysed using inductive thematic content analysis. Important themes identified were the emotional aspects of watching their video, the learning opportunities available with video review, level of support needed for video review and ideal time to review the video. Unexpected emergent themes included foundation doctors’ views about simulation education, reflective practice post-simulation and peer pressure during simulation. This study explored foundation trainees’ perceptions (cognitive, kinetic and affective) about video review after simulation and several interesting themes were identified. We believe this study adds value to simulation-based medical education in helping to understand foundation doctors’ views about simulation and video-assisted debriefing. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.

A10Pilot study looking at the benefits of Virtual Reality (VR) simulation for Physician Associates (PA)

Simulation is a vital part of medical education [1]. It requires many resources to run successfully [2]. Recently, following the COVID-19 pandemic, Virtual Reality (VR) simulation use has increased. There are advantages to using VR now that costs are more reasonable, saving floorspace and facilitators’ time. However, there are concerns about how useful the software is for Physician Associates (PA), the adverse effects of the headset and whether self-directed debriefing is valuable [3]. This study aims to pilot the questionnaire using VR simulation. As part of teaching during September 2022 and January 2023, VR simulation was incorporated into appropriate seminars. At the end of the session, Year 1 PA students were invited to complete an online questionnaire based on the Simulation Effectiveness Tool, which was modified for VR. Before the session, all students were on-boarded to use the Oculus Quest 2 and Oxford Medical Simulation software. Twenty-one out of 25 students completed the questionnaire. 71.4% strongly agreed that VR simulation helped prepare them to respond to a change in the patient’s condition and felt empowered to make clinical decisions. 85.7% felt more confident in providing interventions that foster patient safety. 66.7% felt more confident using evidence-based practice to provide care. When focusing on the self-directed debriefing, 66.7% strongly agreed that it contributed to their learning, and 71.4% strongly agreed that it provided opportunities for self-reflection on their performance. Concerning the headset and software use, 28.6% found it was not easy to log into the headset, but 65% found it easy to load the scenario. 57.1% were confident in navigating the virtual environment. This was after a briefing stage to orientate students to the environment. 70.6% felt safe in the virtual world, and 11.1% felt nauseous while in the scenario. The scenarios were also run via a desktop computer. 85.7% found it easier to navigate the virtual world, with 81% strongly agreeing that they felt immersed in the environment. Surprisingly, 52% of students preferred the desktop version, while 14% favoured it via the Oculus. VR simulation is an impactful method of providing simulation-based medical education without needing a simulation suite or facilitators. Interestingly, the desktop version can provide an experience that students prefer, but this requires further investigation. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.

A113A pilot course amalgamating the benefits of psychological safety, civility, and human factors in a structured debriefing model in simulation-based education

Simulation-based education (SBE) is one of the leading teaching methods in healthcare. Debriefing is the cornerstone of effective simulation-based medical education. Debriefing is considered vital part to learning from simulation, and for the transfer of learning so that it can be applied to other situations [1]. Feedback from four simulation faculty development days identified that debriefers lacked the confidence to address conflict or use the principles of civility to enhance their debriefs. Teaching which has structured debrief covering civility and human factors are the cornerstone to deliver sessions that instil confidence and patient safety within the organization [2]. Human factor principles that employ psychological safety were introduced in the debriefing course with the purpose of upskilling the debriefers. There are various models of debriefing however, the focus was to provide the three-phase conversation structure. The course covered human factor principles alongside debriefing techniques using the three-phase conversation structure and interactive workshops. We enlisted the services of a specialist human factor/civility lecturer, simulation lead and a simulation lecturer to deliver the course. At the end of the course, the participants had to undertake a debrief to consolidate their learning in a supportive environment and immediate evaluation was obtained using a structured questionnaire (see Evaluation themed responses Additionally, a pilot study of five participants who had attended the course were randomly selected for a face-to-face interview twenty-four hours after the course. Three open-ended questions were asked. These focussed on whether the application of psychological safety and human factors enhanced their debriefing skills and suggestions for further course development. The results highlighted the value of the inclusion of human factor principles. Both evaluation methods were positive. Attendees commented on the value-added to their simulation training and wanted these principles to be adapted as a structured course. Acknowledging the fact that the sample recruited was small and may not be statistically significant, a future study will include a bigger sample size. Currently, this is the only organization within the North-East of England that offers standalone debriefing course. There was an overwhelming demand for a course aimed at educators who are engaged in SBE with emphasis on debriefing to consolidate learners’ experience. This course is intended to be delivered to all educators across the North-East region and beyond. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.

Adolescent Interview With a Medical Interpreter: A Standardized Patient Encounter for Pediatric Residents.

Pediatricians can cultivate a more trusting relationship with their non-English speaking patients by emphasizing the importance of upholding patient confidentiality in the presence of an interpreter. We designed a case for pediatric residents to increase comfort when conducting an adolescent interview using a medical interpreter, emphasizing the importance of upholding patient confidentiality, specifically when discussing sensitive health topics. We developed a standardized patient encounter (SPE) for pediatric residents at a large academic institution that focused on exploring sensitive health topics with an adolescent, non-English speaking female patient using an interpreter.A validated survey was administered upon completion of the case, prompting participants to reflect on their comfort and skills with specific activities before and after the case, and was analyzed using paired t-tests. Eighty-nine residents participated; 66 were interns and 23 were in their second year of residency. The mean scores of all paired survey items significantly increased after the case (p<0.01), indicating perceived personal growth in all educational objective categories. The majority of the participants (97%, N=86) agreed that they built skills in understanding cultural humility andcaring for future patients (mean Likert scores: 4.91 and 5.10, respectively). Upon completion of the case, residents reported increased comfort and skills using a medical interpreter for non-English speaking patients within the context of patient-centered care, discussing various sensitive health topics, emphasizing the importance of upholding patient confidentiality, and demonstrating skills in adolescent interviewing. Both medical confidentiality and cultural humility education can be integrated into simulation-based medical education to improve the quality of care for diverse patient populations.